The FOSS world must understand “just install Linux” won’t cut it. We must make “the whole widget” as Jobs would say.
But don’t listen to me, let Stallman make the case:
Richard: I’ve never installed the GNU plus Linux system on a computer myself.
Richard: I always found someone who knew how to do that. Got someone to do it for me.
Me: So it was so difficult that you have not installed…
Richard: No, it's just that I was so busy, I didn’t wanna learn how.
I agree that more can be done in making these things accessible, but most Linux distributions aimed at average users has no learning curve for installing it.
Especially not for someone like RMS. Insert USB drive, boot, follow the prompts. I don't care how busy you are, that's only 2 short steps more than a new windows or mac PC.
If the Linux experience was significantly better than it currently is, people wouldn't have any issues taking that minor step.
The problem is both in the user experience and the familiarity gap, not the ease-of-acess.
@jeffalyanak @freakazoid Indeed. My point isn’t about enthusiasts. They will happily install an operating system and sometimes, the harder the better because it means you get to spend more time learning about the intricacies of your hobby. What we mustn’t do is conflate enthusiasts with people who use technology as an everyday thing.
I don't think it will matter how easy it is to install, even if it was a one-click install, people wouldn't forsake the familiarity of their existing OS for a bunch of lofty nerd ideals.
You'd probably see some amount of additional adoption but for most people there's a very large inertia to overcome and not much pushing on them to move.
@jeffalyanak @freakazoid @aral lemme put it this way. a lot of people have zero free time to burn an install medium and sit through the installation, then configure all the basic system settings and install their programs... that is a non-zero investment of time and effort. you may think it is "negligible", but trust me, it's not about lack of knowledge. and it doesn't compare to having a working computer out-of-the-box.
Lots of companies sell laptops with Linux pre-installed.
Very few people buy these products.
It's not about accessibility, most people wouldn't switch to Linux right now even if you made it a one-click install.
@jeffalyanak @freakazoid @aral there are a *lot* more factors to why someone doesn't buy a specific laptop. awareness, ignorance, preference, features, build quality, etc etc. but the primary observation is that the vast majority of people never install their own operating system -- windows included.
No people are not buying Ubuntu or other big distro computers, but they are buying Chromebooks in droves. Yeah, they're not quite the same thing, but it's still Gentoo under the hood.
@jeffalyanak @aral @trwnh @halfcutskeleton The Chromebook UX is also *amazing* compared to Windows, Mac, or any other Linux distro. Dramatically simpler to deal with, provided you're willing to sell your soul to Google. Far more like an iPhone than like Android, not that Android is that bad from a UX standpoint compared to Windows or Mac.
@freakazoid @trwnh @aral @jeffalyanak their sales are not at a critical level yet, but they're gaining. And here's the real kicker: they're huge in education. Google was super smart to build excellent education tools into G Suite and integrate them into Chromebooks.
The next generation will have grown up with them as their primary device. Already we're seeing the effects in BYOD for business.
@halfcutskeleton @jeffalyanak @aral @trwnh The enterprise features are probably also extremely attractive to schools. And since they're essentially stateless, you don't have to worry about kids installing crap that isn't supposed to be there or inadvertently getting malware. They're basically adminisitration-free.
Linux has no way to compete here without hosted infrastructure of some kind. Which I think we should build.
@trwnh @aral @jeffalyanak @halfcutskeleton Note that I don't consider the success of Chromebook to be a win for Linux in any way. Quite the opposite, in fact: it's Linux being co-opted for a purpose that's quite the opposite of what many of its proponents would like to see it used for, i.e. increasing people's freedom to do what they want with their computers.
On the bright side, they're hackable if you take out the dev screw, probably as a way to buy us off and keep us from griping too much.
@freakazoid @jeffalyanak @aral @trwnh I tend to agree with you. But I think we can take a lesson from Google and from Microsoft, honestly. We need to be extremely competitive in education and business if we want to take more desktop marketshare.
That means building out things like LDAP to offer a truly competitive management platform that can compete with Active Directory AND be cloud-served. You're 100% right about that.
@halfcutskeleton @trwnh @jeffalyanak @freakazoid A Chromebook is the epitome of a surveillance device. “This panopticon runs on Linux” is hardly reason to celebrate. If we follow that line of reasoning, Surveillance Capitalism runs almost exclusively on Linux and Linux doesn’t make any value judgements about surveillance (see Linus’s remarks + the first class support for surveillance capitalism in GNOME, etc.)
@jeffalyanak Jeff, I suspect you call the work a new Linux install entails "negligible" because you've done it often enough it honestly seems easy.
Most of the people you want to persuade to switch have literally never installed an operating system before. They don't know what they're doing, and they aren't going to learn because they're already burned out from everything else they're stuck doing.
They aren't going to become sysadmins just to have a working computer.
@jeffalyanak That's just another challenge: finding out which distros are that simple. Doesn't help that sometimes people will recommend stuff like Arch. I was in the same boat once and ended up buying a book on Linux just to find out what I should be doing.
@besserwisser @jeffalyanak Some people are just trolls, in other cases the person asking doesn't elaborate enough on their current knowledge and experience base. I mean Arch is pretty neat, especially if you want a rolling release or a lean fully featured system, but if the person responding doesn't know that the person asking will probably have trouble dealing with issues during, let's say an Ubuntu install, nobody is really at fault.
@jeffalyanak @freakazoid @aral The desktop experience on Linux is really quite fantastic at this stage (at least it is on KDE, & probably Gnome too). I can't imagine that's a barrier for folks either.
I suspect the reasons for not switching are different for different types of user. For most people, technical & non-technical alike, however, I imagine people are very accustomed to what they have. They probably often think, "why change?"
I do think it varies between desktop environments, but I haven't experienced one that works out-of-the-box for general use as the Windows or Mac environments, but I generally gravitate towards desktop environments that are highly customizable.
I think you hit the nail on the head, though. The operating systems that people use already work for them. The "why change?" question is hard to overcome.
@jeffalyanak @michelamarie @freakazoid @aral but it's Steve Jobs and his obsession with hiding how things work has given birth to surveillance capitalism. Don't follow his ideas. They created the class of "normal" users you see today.
If the same ideas were put to cooking we'd only have microwave dinners: which are notoriously unhealthy.
Teach people to install their choice of OS. Make it as easy as installing a browser.
@jeffalyanak @michelamarie @freakazoid @aral because the "sell the whole thing" stops nowhere. No OS updates except those we bless? Only one browser? A predefined email provider? No installations outside the store?
No. Keep the users in control. Help them learn how things work. If they do the first installation when they get a shiny new computer then they will know to make another later on instead of throwing it out because it's OS is obsolete.
@jeffalyanak @michelamarie @freakazoid @aral and to refute the Richard Stallman argument, if somebody else installed his GNU over Linux, how does he know there aren't any binary blobs in there? What if his trusted installer tomorrow goes corporate? What if Google buys Purism and pushes chrome as default in the next update?
@qwazix @jeffalyanak @freakazoid @aral In other words, Apple "met people where they are," instead of pushing them into the developer's own way of doing things. This, in addition to appealing to consumers aesthetic tastes.
Surely, Linux too can facilitate "low friction" user experiences, but without taking away the power and ability to customise and extend them for more advanced users, different needs, or varied use cases.
@michelamarie Apple is notorious for not moving an inch to meet their users. Their users had CD's. They removed the drives. Their users had USB drives. They removed the ports. They had wired headsets: 3.5mm jack gone. They shape the market whether we like it or not. Chiclet keyboards, check. Clickpads, check. Slim laptops, check. Everything Apple does sticks, whether the users like it or not. @jeffalyanak @freakazoid @aral
@michelamarie don't get me wrong, I like most of their innovations. I have a mac. But I cannot ignore the fact that their business practices are hostile to user freedom, and this is exemplified by their recent war on the "right to repair". And the bad thing is that everybody else follows them even in bad decisions, such as the abstraction of the filesystem on iOS. @jeffalyanak @freakazoid @aral
I like the looks, quality, and security of Apple products but can never bring myself to buy one because of all those restrictions, and of course, because of the sky-high cost of everything Apple. 😳
@michelamarie I beg to differ. Phones had removable batteries. Then the iPhone came. The same with laptops. Jobs waged a war against user freedom and won. And now users demand that level of non-involvement. Design choices are political: european cars never lost the stick. American cars did. The same with the yearly updates. Printer inks. Messengers. Decisons of companies shape the market and (de)educate users. @jeffalyanak @freakazoid @aral
@michelamarie everybody is familiar with (federated) email, it seems simple. However every time I tried to explain the fediverse nobody listens after the words "different servers" and dismisses it as too technical. Why? Because people aren't at any given point, they are trained by their peers. @jeffalyanak @freakazoid @aral
@michelamarie @aral @jeffalyanak @qwazix The experience on Linux is not great if one needs an application that doesn't have a decent open source version or isn't packaged for their distro. AppImages are pretty Mac-like, but that's one of dozens of ways packages are distributed on Linux, versus a couple each on Windows and Mac.
I think there's no question Jobs was fulfilling a market desire. But I don't think his approach to ease-of-use was the only one possible, and I think it was on net harmful.
@qwazix @jeffalyanak @aral @michelamarie I think personal computing devices should be self-teaching rather than intuitive, which can only go so far. And not through a separate "new user experience", but by having the whole user experience be a gradual ramp to advanced use. Jobs and Wozniak could have done this easily, especially if they'd paid more attention to Alan Kay.
@qwazix @jeffalyanak @freakazoid @aral Yah. We disagree on this point. I believe that firms do influence society, though it's more that they are a part of society (products of it, if you will) & are influenced by it, just as individuals are
I don't think Jobs waged a war on freedom, at least not when it comes to batteries or disc drives. He did, however wage wars over intellectual property, which, is definitely a rights issue (a more serious one).